Showing posts with label airports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label airports. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

'Dagenham' idea of Airport off Deal

We thought that the Government's decision on the restart of fracking in Lancshire was Barking last week.... 

Well this week's idea of a Deal Airport on the Godwin Sands is at least two stops beyond that! 

Just in case you have missed it, This idea of a Heathrow replacement 7 miles off the coast on the Godwin Sands has been 'floated'.... I don't think the argument's over Lydd and Manston are fully landed yet.

All this one week after the government deciding not to make it a marine conservation zone

Whoever came up with this one must have been smoking something....

Full story in the EKM http://www.kentonline.co.uk/east_kent_mercury/news/2012/december/19/airport.aspx

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Boris Island back on the agenda in Kent?

Government to consult on Thames Estuary airport

18 January 2012


Commenting on reports that the Government is to hold a formal consultation on controversial plans for a new airport in the Thames Estuary, Friends of the Earth's Executive Director Andy Atkins said:

"A new airport in the Thames estuary would have a devastating impact on local communities and the environment - and all for pie-in-the sky economics that simply don't add up.

"London doesn't need another hub airport - the capital already has more flights to the world's main business destinations than our European neighbours.

"David Cameron's pledge to lead the greenest Government ever will ring hollow if he gives the green light to a huge expansion in air travel."

ENDS
Notes to editors:
1. A Friends of the Earth briefing, Heathrow Expansion - Its True Costs, exposes many of the misleading arguments about the financial benefits of aviation growth.


Saturday, September 3, 2011

Victoria's Green Matters 1st Sept 2011


Deal With IT's Secretary Victoria Nicholls writes a regular column in the East Kent Mercury:
The battle is on to stop the expansion of Lydd Airport. Shepway Council has approved plans to develop the airport but in the face of opposition from concerned residents, environmental and wildlife conservation groups the government has referred the matter to the planning inspectorate. The final decision will rest with the secretary of state for communities and local government, Eric Pickles.

Lydd Airport is tiny and situated close to Dungeness nuclear power station.  It is used by private jets and cargo planes and plans to extend it will change the area completely. Next to the dramatic buildings of the nuclear power station is situated one of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) most important sites in Europe. Expanding Lydd Airport will change the marshland atmosphere in an area of outstanding natural beauty and destroy this amazing habitat for thousands of birds, many of which rely on Dungeness as a food stop on their migratory path. There are dangers from pollution and there are security concerns for the power station.

Some residents want the airport to provide jobs for the dying town but others know that this is a short-term option. The key is in the new name for Lydd Airport – London Ashford. Passengers arriving in larger planes from other countries can be transported to Ashford International station for their train journey into the capital.

As cheap oil becomes a thing of the past and cheap airfares disappear, flights into Lydd will no longer be viable and an important habitat will have been destroyed for nothing.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Boris looks at Cliffe again for an London Airport?

Mayor of London Boris Johnson is considering a proposal to build an airport on the Hoo peninsula in north Kent.

The plan would see the facility built at Cliffe, in an attempt to increase flight capacity around London without extending Heathrow. Other sites under consideration include the Thames Estuary.
Cliffe, which is renowned for its birdlife, was last considered as a site for a new airport in 2002, by the then Labour government. However plans for the site were shelved in December 2003. (from http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/10/25/35017/boris+johnson+considers+kent+airport+proposal.html)

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Victoria's Green Matters - 15th April

Deal With IT's Secretary Victoria Nicholls writes a regular column in the East Kent Mercury:
Airport expansion is always controversial; the expansion of Kent’s Lydd Airport is no exception and is causing major concern for environmentalists, wildlife groups and conservationists.

Lydd Airport is very close to the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) reserve at Dungeness and there is great disquiet about the impact of expansion on the local environment and its wildlife. The Special Protection Area (SPA) of Pett Levels has internationally important bird populations and the Dungeness Special Area of Conservation (SAC) has great crested newts and a rare shingle habitat. The proposed runway extension would see the loss of part of the Dungeness SAC and the destruction of part of the Dungeness Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) which is geologically important.

Dungeness is the site of the RSPB’s oldest reserve and is home to some 120,000 birds. Birds and aeroplanes sharing the same air space is a recipe for disaster both for the birds and the planes as bird strikes have caused the loss of at least 55 civil aircraft worldwide.

The need for jobs and an increase in tourism in the Lydd area are usually trotted out as justifications for expansion but are invalid when journey times to London via Ashford and the High Speed Rail Link are boasted about. Just who is going to benefit if these plans go ahead? Not the local population, it would seem. Maybe the Saudi businessman who owns Lydd Airport – proposed to be known as London Ashford Airport – means to increase his personal fortune.
 
The increased greenhouse gas emissions resulting from growth in air travel will have a negative effect on climate change and wipe out all the emissions reductions achieved through our expanded use of renewable energy.

It is difficult to imagine why anyone could possibly consider damage to such environmentally sensitive sites an acceptable way forward in this day and age.