KCC’s Rubbish Proposals
Jamie Weir, PR & Events
Manager, Protect Kent
19th March 2012
Did you see Kent County Council’s
public consultation on their household waste recycling centre (HWRC) service
which opened at the end of last year? Better still, were you one of the 3,500
people that responded to it by the deadline of 9th February? Most importantly,
do you know that based on the results of the consultation, KCC are proposing to
close the household waste recycling centres at Richborough and Hawkinge? If
your answers to these questions are no, we (Protect Kent) are not in the least
surprised!
For the past year, since April
2011, KCC have been conducting a review of HWRCs in Kent. Providing and managing these sites is a
statutory requirement of KCC under the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The
review of the current network of 19 sites across Kent forms part of KCC’s
on-going cost-cutting exercise.
As part of the review process,
KCC’s own Policy Overview and Scrutiny Committee asked for a public consultation
on the draft proposals. The consultation opened in December at a time when
everyone’s mind was focussed on preparing for Christmas. It was so poorly
advertised that few people knew of its existence (as evidenced by only 3,500
responses from a Kent population of over 1.4 million). It was based on a biased
questionnaire constructed to give the answers that best suited the Waste
Management Section’s aims. It suggests that very few people will be affected by
the closures (for example, only 150 homes in the Sandwich area). This is
obviously a significant departure from reality as Sandwich alone has a
population of around 7000!
In common with people from those
communities around Hawkinge and Richborough who will lose out from the
withdrawal of this service, Protect Kent are alarmed that KCC are even
considering such backward steps.
Andrew Ogden, Campaigns Manager
for Protect Kent said:
“KCC should be encouraging even
greater efforts by the public to recycle their waste, building towards a
sustainable future. Closing these sites gives the wrong message to local
residents and reduces the incentive for them to manage and dispose of their
waste in a sensible way.”
Andrew continued: “We are also
concerned that this move could lead to a greater incidence of fly-tipping in
the rural areas around these sites when closed. Fly-tipping is anti-social,
harmful to wildlife, often causes pollution, and is a significant eyesore in
our beautiful Kent countryside. Of course, KCC are not responsible for clearing
fly-tipped waste – this falls on the local authority or the unlucky land-owner
– so the closure of Hawkinge and Richborough HWRCs will be of no disbenefit to
them.”
At today’s meeting of the
Cabinet, KCC’s Members deferred making a final decision on the recommendations
of the HWRC Review until the full Council meeting on 29th March. Local pressure
groups have welcomed this delay, seeing it as an opportunity to lobby Members
further and get them to appreciate the strength of support for keeping the
sites open.
Protect Kent will be backing this
action and seeking further opinion from KCC on issues such as potentially
opening the sites at weekends only, limiting the wastes received to only the
commonest types and whether the guideline 20 minutes maximum travel time to alternative
sites is both practical and realistic
for affected local residents.
No comments:
Post a Comment